The Good Soldier Švejk by Jaroslav Hašek 57
CP operative, interlocutors should observe four general conversational maxims:
Quantity (M.Qn.)
|
1. Make your contribution as informative as is required (for the current purpose of exchange).
|
|
2. Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.
|
Quality (M.Q1.)
|
1. Do not say what you believe is false.
|
|
2. Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.
|
Relation (M.R.)
|
1.Be relevant.
|
Manner (M.M.)
|
1. Avoid obscurity of expression.
|
|
2. Avoid ambiguity.
|
|
3. Be brief (avoid unnecessary prolixity).
|
|
4. Be orderly. (45-46)
|
Grice is extremely careful to avoid the impression that his "maxims of felicitous conversation" are either exhaustive or all-inclusive. He allows that in a conversation some other maxims might be observed (aesthetic, social, moral) to implement a specific goal toward which the talk is directed. Furthermore, not all conversations, he concedes, are dedicated totally to the most effective passage of information, and so these maxims will have to be broadened to accommodate various strategic uses of language. Finally, not every instance of nonfulfillment of the four maxims necessarily entails the abandonment of the CP. Grice lists four
ways in which a speaker might fail to observe a maxim:
1. He may quietly and unostentatiously violate a maxim; if so, in some cases he will be liable to mislead.
2. He may opt our from the operation both of the maxim and the CP; he may say, indicate, or allow it to become plain that he is unwilling to cooperate in the way the maxim requires....
3. He might be faced by a clash: He may be unable, for example, to fulfill the first maxim of Quantity (Be as informative as is required) without violating the second maxim of Quality (Have adequate evidence for what you say).
4. He may flout a maxim; that is may blatantly fail to fulfill it. On the assumption that the speaker is able to fulfill the maxim and to do so without violating another maxim (because of a clash), is not opting out, and is not, in view of the blatancy of his performance, trying to mislead, the hearer is faced with a minor problem: How can his saying what he did say be reconciled with the supposition that he is observing the overall
CP? This situation is one that characteristically
|